|
|
Past and Present Water Supplies
Since the beginning of the 20th century, El Paso County has relied on both surface water and groundwater for municipal water supply. Currently, El Paso Water Utilities (EPWU) supplies about 90% of all municipal water in El Paso County. Surface water is supplied from the Rio Grande. The Rio Grande flows that are diverted in the El Paso area are primarily derived from snowmelt runoff in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico. Historically, there are also occasional flood surges associated with storm systems in the summer monsoon season. Spring runoff is stored in Elephant Butte Reservoir in southern New Mexico before releases are made for irrigation and municipal use in southern New Mexico and the El Paso area. EPWU is a customer of the local irrigation district (El Paso County Water Improvement District No.1), and obtains water through ownership of water rights land and leasing of water rights from agricultural water rights holders in El Paso County.
Groundwater supplies are pumped from the Mesilla Bolson and the Hueco Bolson. The extent of these groundwater basins are shown below, and underlie portions of New Mexico, Texas and Chihuahua. Groundwater occurs in unconsolidated fluvial, alluvial, and lacustrine sediments. The Rio Grande plays an important role in the recharge and discharge of both groundwater basins.
|
|
As shown below, EPWU pumping in the Hueco Bolson peaked at about 80,000 acre-feet per year (AF/yr) in 1989. As a result of concerns regarding the long-term ability to continue this level of pumping (e.g. Muller and Price, 1979 and Boyle Engineering, 1991), EPWU implemented the following water management strategies: 1) adopted a rate structure that increases the cost of water for high use, 2) promoted water conservation through various incentive programs, 3) increased the use of Rio Grande Water, and 4) expanded the reuse of reclaimed water. |
 |
EPWU pumping in the Hueco Bolson in 2002 was below 40,000 AF/yr for the first time since 1967. Hueco pumping increased in 2003 and 2004 from 2002 levels due to a drought and the associated reduction in surface water diversions. Pumping again dropped below 40,000 AF/yr in 2005 as a result of a return of nearly full river allocation conditions. The conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater (increasing groundwater pumping in times of surface water shortages) to meet overall demands is part of EPWU?s overall water supply strategy.
The surface water plants have a combined capacity of 100 mgd. Under normal river flow conditions, the plants operate seven months during the year (i.e. during the irrigation season). EPWU is a customer of El Paso County Water Improvement District No.1, and receives water from the Rio Grande Project via its ownership of lands within the project area or through leases from water rights holders. Currently, El Paso has water rights of about 65,000 AF/yr from the Rio Grande Project in a full allocation year.
Total demand has been declining since the late 1990s due to conservation and pricing strategies. Current total demand is about 110,000 AF/yr. Per capita demand has been reduced from about 225 gallons per person per day in the 1970s to about 137 gallons per person per day in 2005.
Summary of Integrated Water Management Strategies for El Paso County
The recently completed Regional Water Plan for Far West Texas included a study of alternative means of supplying nonagricultural water to El Paso County through the year 2060. Based on current capacities of wells and surface water plants, and the limitation that surface water is only available during the irrigation season, total available municipal supply in El Paso County is about 150,000 AF/yr. This total includes about 5,000 AF/yr of reclaimed water supply that is available independent of drought conditions. Under full surface water allocation conditions, municipal surface water supply is about 60,000 AF/yr. Under these conditions, Hueco Bolson groundwater pumping supply is about 50,000 AF/yr, and Mesilla Bolson pumping supply is about 35,000 AF/yr for the entire County (FWTRPG, 2006). Under drought-of-record conditions, it is expected that surface water supplies would drop to 10,000 AF/yr. During drought-of-record conditions, pumping supplies in the Hueco Bolson increase to 90,000 AF/yr and Mesilla Bolson pumping supplies increase to 45,000 AF/yr in order to maintain the full supply of 150,000 AF/yr.
The figure below summarizes these conjunctive use scenarios. Scenario 1 represents a full surface water allocation scenario. Scenario 6 represents a drought-of-record scenario. Scenarios 2 through 5 represent intermediate surface water allocation scenarios that are less than full allocation, but more than drought-of-record conditions. |
The conjunctive use management of surface water and groundwater resources in El Paso County recognizes that there are limits to surface water supplies and limits to groundwater supplies. The most significant limitation to the surface water supply is that droughts occur, and surface water allocations are reduced in some years. As a result of reduced river availability, groundwater pumping is increased in order to meet demands. The management of local groundwater requires the recognition of limits with respect to the ability of local groundwater basins to supply water reliably over many decades. Simply increasing local groundwater pumping to meet increased demands has been shown to be an ineffective groundwater management strategy in El Paso County in terms of water quantity (declining groundwater levels) and water quality (brackish groundwater intrusion).
Future demands are projected to increase as a result of increasing population. A summary of the expected water demand increases for the entire County and within the EPWU service area are shown below. The current supply is about 150,000 AF/y. Current supplies can meet expected future demands until sometime between 2015 and 2020.
|
| El Paso County Supply and Demand Comparison |
| Year |
El Paso County
Demand AF/yr |
El Paso County
Supply AF/yr |
Supplied by EPWU
AF/yr |
Percent Supplied by EPWU |
| 2005 |
123,717 |
150,000 |
113,721 |
91.9 |
| 2010 |
138,905 |
152,387 |
122,667 |
88.3 |
| 2020 |
164,672 |
165,531 |
143,072 |
86.9 |
| 2030 |
187,557 |
188,676 |
161,025 |
85.9 |
| 2040 |
207,317 |
207,820 |
176,676 |
85.2 |
| 2050 |
227,299 |
227,964 |
192,592 |
84.7 |
| 2060 |
247,424 |
248,109 |
208,573 |
84.3 |
|
The 2006 regional plan included the development of six alternative integrated strategies to meet future demands after 2020. The strategies were ?integrated? in that they included local surface water, local groundwater, expansion of reclaimed water and imported groundwater. Potential areas considered for importation of groundwater included properties currently owned by EPWU as follows:
- ?Capitan Reef Properties? located in Hudspeth and Culberson Counties that overlie the Capitan Reef Aquifer (about 30,000 acres)
- Wildhorse Ranch in Culberson County that overlies the Wildhorse Flat area of the West Texas Bolson Aquifer (about 21,000 acres)
- Antelope Ranch in Presidio and Jeff Davis Counties that overlies the Ryan Flat area of the West Texas Bolson Aquifer (about 25,000 acres)
The plan also considered properties in the Dell City area that overlie the Bone Spring/Victorio Peak Aquifer. EPWU does not currently own any land or water rights in this area. The location of properties owned by EPWU and the Dell City area properties are shown below. |

|
Groundwater from the Dell City area would require desalination due to high concentrations of total dissolved solids (about 2,500 mg/l). Groundwater in the Capitan Reef area could require desalination if pumping induced brackish groundwater flow from the west. Groundwater in the Wildhorse Ranch and Antelope Ranch area would not require desalination.
Litigation regarding the water rights in the Dell City area is ongoing, and EPWU has decided to suspend negotiations to purchase any Dell City property until the litigation is settled, or the courts render a decision. However, for purposes of long-term planning, the Far West Texas Regional Water Plan considered the Dell City properties as a potential source of supply for El Paso.
The 2006 regional plan provided for meeting all future non agricultural demands in El Paso County through the adoption of Alternative 6, which included conjunctive use of local surface and groundwater resources, continued conservation, expansion of reclaimed water use, and the importation of groundwater from the Dell City area and from the Capitan Reef Aquifer, located southeast of Dell City. A summary of Alternative 6 is presented in the table presented below. Other potential imported supplies identified in other alternatives from Antelope Ranch and Wildhorse Ranch will not be used prior to 2060 under the adopted alternative.
|
|
Year |
|
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
| Existing Conjunctive Use Supply |
145,000 |
145,000 |
145,000 |
145,000 |
145,000 |
145,000 |
| Existing Reclaimed Water Supply |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
| Additional Reclaimed Water Supply |
2,387 |
5,531 |
8,676 |
11,820 |
14,964 |
18,109 |
| Additional Rio Grande Diversions |
0 |
10,000 |
15,000 |
20,000 |
20,000 |
20,000 |
| Dell City Groundwater |
0 |
0 |
15,000 |
16,000 |
33,000 |
50,000 |
| Capitan Reef Groundwater |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
| Total Supply |
152,387 |
165,531 |
188,676 |
207,820 |
227,964 |
248,109 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Projected Demand |
138,905 |
164,672 |
187,557 |
207,317 |
227,299 |
247,424 |
| Projected Population |
714,375 |
823,104 |
918,534 |
1,000,838 |
1,083,142 |
1,165,446 |
|
Discussion
Rio Grande diversions (and associated increases in local groundwater pumping in drought years) are estimated to be needed by 2020 in order to meet increased demands. These diversions would be increased again in 2030 and 2040.
Importation of groundwater from the Dell City area would begin in 2030, and increase each decade until 2060 when total importation would reach 50,000 AF/yr. The Hudspeth County Underground Water Conservation District No. 1 has adopted a management plan and rules to implement the management plan that is based on an estimated availability of groundwater (63,000 AF/yr). The rules further set limits on pumping based on existing and historic uses though a complex permitting process that results in the issuance of a permit for ?validated land?. Irrigation water is allocated up to 4.0 AF/acre of validated land. This allocation can be reduced if the groundwater elevation in a single monitoring well falls below a specified elevation. Under the current rules, if a validation permit holder wishes to transfer groundwater out of the district, the limitation for pumping is set up to 2.8 AF/acre of validated land, as transfers are limited to the consumptive use of water rather than the total pumping. Under these rules, in order to meet the Far West Texas Regional Water Plan projections of an El Paso groundwater importation project in 2060 (50,000 AF/yr) and assuming that a desalination plant could be operated at 80% efficiency, El Paso would need to own about 22,300 acres of validated land, and total pumping would be about 62,500 AF/yr.
Importation from the Capitan Reef properties currently owned by EPWU would begin in 2040, and remain at 10,000 AF/yr through the balance of the planning period. The best available information regarding the hydrogeology suggests that the recharge to the Diablo Farms area is about 15,400 AF/yr. It has also been estimated that annual pumping in the range of 25,000 to 30,000 AF/yr would result in annual groundwater level declines of about 2 to 3.5 feet. The relatively low amount of projected pumping contained in the regional plan acknowledges the uncertainty in how much can be pumped in a sustainable manner, and recognizes the potential for brackish groundwater intrusion.
Participation in the regional planning process is an important factor in overall groundwater management for El Paso. El Paso?s anticipated need to transfer water in the mid 2020s from other areas of the Far West Texas Region will necessitate the development and communication of future groundwater management approaches to other landowners in the area. The participatory nature of regional water plan development is an ideal forum to work with others in the region to manage water on a regional basis. Inclusion of the strategies in the State Water Plan is also a prerequisite for any potential state finding assistance for local projects.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|